You could be forgiven for assuming that Glass, Google's head-mounted augmented-
reality device, had been effectively dead since 2015. But as Google’s sister company X, the Moonshot Factory, announced on Tuesday, the project has been pivoting to a business-to-business model over the past two years. The new, updated version of the device is known as Glass Enterprise Edition, and it’s been put to use at companies like Boeing, DHL—and in your physician’s office.
Going to the doctor today is “a pretty tragic experience,” says Ian Shakil, the CEO and co-founder of a company called Augmedix. Its platform enables physicians to wear Glass Enterprise Edition as they see patients, while remote medical scribes fill out the electronic medical records based on what they hear and see from the visit.
The doctor’s office experience is unpleasant, Shakil claims, thanks to all the time the physician spends looking at a screen and typing, as opposed to just focusing on interacting with the patient at hand. Augmedix’s message to doctors is: “Put on Glass, go have normal conversations with your patients." Meanwhile, the audio and video streamed from the Glass go to a trained medical scribe, who may be located in a place like California, India, or Bangladesh, and whose job it is to fill in the electronic health records.
The integrated display on Glass can be used to provide the doctor with information about the patient in real time as they perform the examination.
The system is thus a fusion of a high-tech streaming service with a tried-and-true human component on the other end. And while it might seem like AI and voice-recognition software might be well-positioned to do a job like this, Shakil says that what the scribes are doing isn’t transcribing the visits word for word, which would result in a block of text, but instead producing a “structured medical note” from the conversation.
Some people will likely find it creepy that their doctor is beaming audio and video to a remote assistant, especially if they’re in their skivvies. But the final decision about the system’s usage is determined by the patient. It’s not a mandatory part of receiving care.
